
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Ruby on Rails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eronj.com/2005/12/21/microsofts-ruby-on-rails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eronj.com/2005/12/21/microsofts-ruby-on-rails/</link>
	<description>Ron K. Jeffries -- Listen, read, think, write. Rinse and repeat as needed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labnotes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Best advise I heard today</title>
		<link>http://blog.eronj.com/2005/12/21/microsofts-ruby-on-rails/#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>Labnotes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Best advise I heard today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eronj.com/2005/12/21/microsofts-ruby-on-rails/#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>[...] Best advise I heard today Ron Jeffries writes: So why should Bill Gates and Ray Ozzie back Ruby on Rails? Because it has struck a nerve with leading edge web designer. If Microsoft wants to get its groove on (terrible pun) a huge fast innovative push with RoR would get the world’s attention. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Best advise I heard today Ron Jeffries writes: So why should Bill Gates and Ray Ozzie back Ruby on Rails? Because it has struck a nerve with leading edge web designer. If Microsoft wants to get its groove on (terrible pun) a huge fast innovative push with RoR would get the world’s attention. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

